<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legislating the U.S. into Consumer Directed Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://company.changehealthcare.com/legislating-the-u-s-into-consumer-directed-healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://company.changehealthcare.com/legislating-the-u-s-into-consumer-directed-healthcare/</link>
	<description>Behind the Scenes at change:healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:46:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Frederiksen</title>
		<link>http://company.changehealthcare.com/legislating-the-u-s-into-consumer-directed-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>David Frederiksen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://company.changehealthcare.com/?p=926#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Decreasing the ranks of the un-and-under-insured is an important issue, but there are significant cost-increases inherent in achieveing that goal. While I wholeheartedly believe that access to care needs to improve dramatically for the un-and-under-insured, such an increase is by default, an increase in demand. Simple economics shows that if you increase demand, and supply remains the same, prices (i.e. costs for everyone - employers and consumers) will go up. With prices going up and more of healthcare costs born by the patient/consumer, increasing access to care will also servce to force the issue of consumerism in the private healthcare market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decreasing the ranks of the un-and-under-insured is an important issue, but there are significant cost-increases inherent in achieveing that goal. While I wholeheartedly believe that access to care needs to improve dramatically for the un-and-under-insured, such an increase is by default, an increase in demand. Simple economics shows that if you increase demand, and supply remains the same, prices (i.e. costs for everyone &#8211; employers and consumers) will go up. With prices going up and more of healthcare costs born by the patient/consumer, increasing access to care will also servce to force the issue of consumerism in the private healthcare market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://company.changehealthcare.com/legislating-the-u-s-into-consumer-directed-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://company.changehealthcare.com/?p=926#comment-875</guid>
		<description>Hey Robert, any idea on how the changes proposed by the president will effect change:healthcare? Or rather, what value does a company like change:healthcare bring to the market to support consumers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Robert, any idea on how the changes proposed by the president will effect change:healthcare? Or rather, what value does a company like change:healthcare bring to the market to support consumers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
