As of April 1 in Illinois, they have taken step 1 in protecting the uninsured. A new law caps uninsured patient bills at cost +35%.

Hooray! A good first step!

Now don’t rest on your laurels, Illinois.

Cost plus is great if you can understand the “costs” portion, but most patients do not. Step 2 is to root out the inefficiencies and poor procedures.

For example, it’s reasonable to charge someone an amount for a service well done and efficiently. But for the patient who gets 5 nurses at bedside, 3 specialists and the whole battery of tests to determine that he has a splinter, cost plus is not effective. Cost plus just rewards the hospital with an amount they can pursue aggressively and justifiably in collections. The patient may still be exposed to inefficiencies like improper diagnosis, inappropriate treatment and inefficient practices.

Step 1 is easy. Now for the hard part. Step 2 - improve the standard of care.

Still, congrats to you Illinois!

Thursday’s Healthpopuli post caught my eye - Hospitals’ fiscal health is eroding. More than 50% of hospitals had a negative margin in Q4 2008. Sounds like the hospitals need wellness and disease management programs to address their ailing health just like patients are getting.

The main reason cited in Healthpopuli for the poor fiscal health is that admissions are down. Another oft-cited factor is the proliferation of HDHP (High Deductible Health Plans) where consumers are left with the first $1500, $2000 or even as much as $5000 of their healthcare expenses within a given year. 

It’s easy to place the blame on fewer people coming through the doors, but who knows, maybe we’re getting healthier or just using better judgement about what constitutes a needed procedure. Maybe our wellness and DM programs are working. Insurance companies and self-insured employers should be jumping for joy at the news because that SHOULD translate to lower healthcare expenses for them in the form of fewer claims - at least in the short term. Hospital should be taking a collective sigh of relief that they can finally slow down on adding yet another massive capital building project to meet the ever-increasing demand. That might save them some of their cash and get them closer to being profitable again.

It’s easy to place the blame on consumers not paying their bills, but perhaps it’s an opportunity for hospitals to take a good hard look at their processes and procedures and address ineffiencies. In reporting a negative earnings period, one hospital identified five reasons they were unprofitable, and there is no small amount of irony in the fact that they attributed $200K of their $1.6M shortfall to overruns in their self-insured health plan for the hospital as an employer.

With the average deductible rate topping $1000 for the first time in history and 20% of employers saying they are considering dropping their healthcare plan, it looks as if simply raising the rates at the hospital is not going to be a solution. Demand is already down. Payment is already off. Raising rates will only further stifle demand and higher rates will only result in increased non-payment. Blood will not flow from a stone no matter how deep you cut it.

Just as a physician must not allow themselves to treat the symptom, but instead identify the disease, hospitals find themselves in the same position. The health system as a whole is diseased - from patient, to insurer, to provider to government. As patients, we are being forced to take more responsibility through increased share of the burden of the costs, wellness and disease managemet programs. Insurers have work to do as well (that’s another post). Governement is studying where they need to go. Hospitals need to begin to look at what they can do in terms of equivalent wellness and disease management programs for their facilities. They need to trim the fat. They need to be more efficient. They need to proactively seek out better long-term solutions instead of resorting to quick fixes as the insurance company all too often forces them to do.

The poor fiscal health of hospitals is not the cause, it is the symptom. Time to get the diagnosis right, start treating the disease and not fixate on the symptoms.

And no sooner than I hit the publish button on this post, Jen McCabe Gorman tweets EXACTLY what I’m talking here on Henry Ford Clinic.

Just saw the CNN report on 13 million uninsured 20-somethings in this country. New to the job force and turning down their health insurance.

What are they thinking?!?! Do they believe that they can just go out and buy what they need in terms of medical goods and services on the free market? Good grief! This is America for goodness sakes.

So what are they doing in lieu of buying insurance?

Radical things like minding their health– watching what they eat, working out, bundling up before they go out in the cold, washing their hands (oh, these kids – they’re like modern day hippies shunning the norms of society).

They go to the doctor only when absolutely necessary instead of for every little ache and pain. They go to retail clinics (like Minute Clinic and The Little Clinic) where they know the costs BEFORE they buy (oh my, what are these kids coming to wanting to know the price before they blindly incur the expense). They look things up on the internet (It may be MY chronic disease but shouldn’t the doctor know more about it than me? He treats it, and I only live with it…every single day of my life).

But why should these 13 million have insurance? In case something happens.

Hellooooo – they’re 20-somethings and invincible.

But seriously, why should they? Because it underwrites the rates of the older portion of the population. If they don’t get healthcare, they don’t offset the risk pool – they don’t underwrite the older segment of the population. And we know what that means – our rates will go up because they aren’t contributing monetarily (and taking less out than they put in) as we expect them to do.

But we can still get them. In New Jersey, children can stay on their parents insurance to age 30! Thirty!!!! In many other states it’s only 24 or so.

So now I’ll set aside the sarcasm.

What we are seeing is the revolution. The new generation is taking a stand. We have a product – health insurance – AND THEY ARE NOT BUYING! The business world should get the message here. These folks are going to opt for surgery overseas, retail clinics and internet consults. They are going to cost shop prescriptions and doctors. They are going to demand affordable access to care and they are going to want to know the price AHEAD of time. And they are going to return health insurance to truly being insurance – a safety net for catastrophic situations instead of the all you can eat buffet for $20 we have bad for soooo long – too long.

Do NOT think that it is the sage old regime of healthcare executives and politicos in D.C. who are going to change healthcare. It is the 20-somethings. They alone are able to break out of the old ways of thinking. It has been that way generation after generation. THEY have the new ideas. THEY are taking a more rational approach. They are getting organized and THEY are not content to go along with the system as it has been.

Yes, they are 13 million without health insurance…and growing. THEY will change healthcare.

Dr. Stanley Feld, “Top Health Blogger” by Wellsphere, claims that the healthcare reform agenda has already been set by Obama and Daschle.  You can read his post here.  He has some good points regarding reform and the need to involve physicians in the process.  However, his post struck a chord with me when he wrote about everyone believing that doctors are at fault, and that the government is out to change the way that doctors practice medicine.

I feel that most people agree that the quality of care in our system needs to improve.  Some might agree that reimbursement patterns must shift to reward high quality healthcare and wellness.  Few might agree that doctors are going to have to change the way they practice medicine, whether its integrating information technology and electronic medical records, or estabilishing stronger doctor patient relationships.  I would like to hear your opinions…

In the meantime, I wrote a response to Dr. Felds opinion piece.  It is available below:

“Dr. Feld,

I respect your opinion on the involvement of patients AND physicians in healthcare reform and policy. But without reading the by-line, about half way through your piece, I could tell you were an MD incapable of writing an unbiased piece on healthcare reform.

Problem: Unfortunately, not all doctors are out to service the best interests of their patients and some are most concerned with the thickness of their wallets. When I go to the doctor, why can’t he tell me about how much the services will cost?

Problem: We pay doctors only when patients are sick. You don’t make money if you keep me healthy, now do you?

Problem: The average patient does not understand medicine or the CONFUSING healthcare system.

The worst part of it all - is that I would argue that most MDs do not understand the system either. While I agree with you that “Socializing” healthcare is not the appropriate answer to our problem, I whole-heartedly disagree that the government is trying to “FORCE DOCTORS TO CHANGE THE WAY THEY PRACTICE MEDICINE.”

Let’s not equate “changing the way doctors practice medicine” with “changing incentives and reimbursement.” This is about keeping more people healthy and increasing the quality of care delivered. This is about rewarding physicians for delivering high quality care and keeping their patients healthy. This is about asking doctors to do their job efficiently and accurately. If to do this doctors have to change the way they “practice medicine,” then I might argue that they entered medicine for the wrong reason to begin with.
Transparency. Accountability. Competition. – Its time to make some changes in healthcare!”

Just had a great interview with some allies in the battle to bring transparency to the healthcare system. I spoke with Kristy Williams of Alijor and for those not familiar with them, the concept is interesting. On Alijor, patients can connect with providers to address their specific need(s). Simply opening a line of communication between provider and patient is a huge need.Alijor facilitates just that and more.

Right now, there is a lot of effort going into the effort to bring transparency to healthcare, and we’ve met a lot of them in the past two years of doing this. We’re going to meet more in the coming years, but it’s nice to find friends in among the fray who are thinking outside of the box and who share our goals.

We need all of the friends we can get. Thanks guys!

Had a bit of outpatient surgery done on my legs today. Laser ablation on my legs to eliminate varicose veins. Basically they numb the site, locate the vein using ultrasound, insert a fiber optic cable and cauterize the veins closed at the faulty junction. I was awake and on no drugs for the whole procedure. Opted out of the Valium to calm my nerves. And I “tweeted” (used twitter) the entire experience in real-time. Some of those who follow me suggested I post the tweets. So here they are. For the twitter-savvy, the order is in chron order - went thru the trouble so it would read from top to bottom.

Alrighty now. Get ready for live tweets from surgery. Getting laser ablation on my legs this am.

Got some great paper shorts. Then they french cut them up the side. Gr8!

Pre-op ultrasound.

I’ve got 10mg valium just in case I get nervous. So far no drugs.

Betadine on the legs. Damn this room is cold.

Ah, the joys of medicine. All dignity is sacrificed

Enter the rockstar…erm…doc

Oh crap. The ultrasound is running thru a laptop running windows platform.

To clarify. Having laser ablation to remove varicose veins.

First stick. Little bit o lidocaine. No biggee. Laser in.

2 lasers in top part of left leg. Little bit of sting not bad. Getting a tattoo is worse.

Doc explaining procedure and pointing out what’s going on on the screen.

Looking at ultrasound, doc says,”That’s the sheath and this is the laser” blown up to several times actual size this looks painful. But its not.

Lydocain and sodium bi-carb going in around site for laser. Provides better contact and numbs. Extreme laser heat next.

Head down to make vein smaller. First shot of laser stings a bit. Getting more numbing med.

Getting a bit of a burning taste in the back of my throat. Normal perdoc. No pain now from laser.

2 veins down. 2 to go. 1 lower left leg. 1 lower right leg. Top left leg done.

FYI there will not be pix of this one. Will bring cam next time. Back of the legs in a couple of weeks.

“Lower leg harder to anethesize” yeah thanks doc. Noticing that.

And lasering the lower left. Much quicker set up.

Dr. Bonau rocks! Gr8 sense of humor about all of this. He’s not sure what twitter is but he’s indulging me.

Feels like a bad windows program – searching…searching…searching. Looking for something on left leg. Left is all in back so will get it in 2 weeks. Done.

Now its time for cleanup. Wiping down the betadine from my freshly shaved legs. Maybe I’ll b faster on the bike now.

@bobcoffield @matt_mueller @georgesibble and others. Thanks for all of the support. @caparks. Thanks for the ride.

Leg wrapped tight. Stays bandaged for 48 hrs. No bath. Hmmmm.

Kroger pharmacy - healthcare consumer shout of the day! They have $4 generics but 3x 10mg valium generic only $2.63.

@jenmccabegorman I’m sure its even cheaper in the netherlands.

@bobcoffield had this done at ages 16 and 18. Now at 41. Have watched options evolve. Laser ablation is best imho.

@georgesibble Yep. Normal routine. Movement is good for circulation in lower leg. No heavy lifting. Ibuprofen o’ plenty.

Transparency: Dr. Bonau has performed this surgery 2500 times. 2 cases w complications. Both successfully resolved.

Consumerism, just like transparency, is a current industry buzz word.  It is thrown around like everyone knows exactly what “healthcare consumerism” means.  However, consumerism often refers to the “derogatory” idea of society being preoccupied with the acquisition of consumer goods. Since healthcare consumerism is intended to represent a more positive movement, I am going to lay it all out on the table.

Consumerism, in relation to healthcare, is about moving past the perception that someone else is responsible to make decisions for us. We need to shift our thinking to be more actively engaged in our health and healthcare decisions.

Think about it - active participation and education prior to decision-making occurs in almost every other industry and consumer purchase… e.g. automobiles, electronics, home buying. Why are we so inclined to remain a bystander when it comes to healthcare? We need to move past the era of the passive patient.

Read the rest of this entry »

The proof of our book is in and people have already started to latch onto the free downloadable PDF version at My Healthcare Is Killing Me.

Seems like we might have struck a bit of a nerve.

Thanks so much to Bob Coffield for the shout out on the book. Can’t wait to catch up with him at Health 2.0 in just a few weeks. Bob is a master of Twitter. If you don’t know him, he’s @bobcoffield.

We’ll probably catch a lot of hell from Steven Krein at OrganizedWisdom for not calling it change:healthcare, but we’re working on that as another title and hope to have it out before November .

And many thanks to the others like Frank Hone and “Why Healthcare Matters” and Zane Safrit who have started to pick up on the book.

We’ve come a long way from the days of the snake oil salesman doctors. We have metrics, proof, real information, process, procedure and healthcare is FAR better as a result.

But I’m reaching saturation point with the quality talk. The only available quality metrics are on the hospitals, but they are comprised of individual docs who make up the numbers. Those docs come and go. The fact that even USA Today points out, is that most are clustered around an “average.” And that means you get basically the same quality of healthcare service in the US wherever you go with few exceptions.

As for those exceptions, they are few and far between, so they’re not accessible for all of us. And if we all go them, their ability to provide that quality of service will suffer as they realize increased volume and stress on their systems.

And still, I can go to the best hospital in town, but it comes down to the doc. If I have a condition the doc has not seen before, the quality is arguably going to suffer. Or possibly worse, if they’ve hired on some quack, and I get stuck with them in the ER, my quality experience will suffer.

That means that failing reliable data on a specific doc if all healthcare clusters around “average,” then the only quantifiable differentiator is price. So what is reliable data? Malpractice information? Do I look at number of claims or size of awards or awards in aggregate? Or should it be malpractice claims for a certain condition versus number of times treating that condition?

Maybe outcomes data is more important. So do I look at number of deaths? Make sure it’s severity adjusted so you don’t knock the doc for seeing a higher number of really sick patients. And be sure you take into account if the doc has just picked up a new procedure that will improve those abysmal outcomes he/she has been having.

This is why Zagats has gotten into the ratings game - it’ subjective - entirely. The meal you get one night at a restaurant is not the same meal you get the next night. The chef may change. The steak may be fresher. There may be a larger crowd.

It’s the same with healthcare. Have a procedure done. You might have a better blood pressure and better conditioning than the other person. Certain procedures may be valid for you but not for someone else.

It’s subjective. Quality in healthcare is almost entirely subjective. The quantifiable metric is cost. That’s the primary reason we chose to pick up the Hospital Value Index in our application because they factor cost in where others do not. So since everyone is basically “average” without specific data on a doc, ask this simple question the next time you require healthcare, “How much should I pay for this snake oil?”

The best thing about this job is that we get to meet some really great people. Today we met some outstanding folks who are going to make a difference.

Cover America made a stop right here in Nashville today and a few of the change:healthcare team had a chance to catch up with them. The cross country trek to capture stories of consumers’ difficulties with the healthcare system is part of a Consumer Reports effort on the healthcare front.

We really enjoyed meeting Meg, Blake, Pauline and Liz. Even got our photo with the RV in Centennial Park, in the shadow of Hospital Corporation of America (oh, how we love the irony of that one). Many thanks to these folks for what they are doing - fighting for the healthcare consumer.

Meg is getting a much deserved break after three weeks on the road, and we wish her a happy mini-vacation.

The rest of the crew is headed on to eastern Kentucky before hitting Virginia. We are going to try and hook them up with our favorite West Virginian, Bob Coffield of the Health Care Law Blog when they hit Charleston.